Monday, 8 June 2015

Dog Killed in South County SWAT Raid Was "Charging to Attack," Police Report Claims By Nicholas Phillips

ZorichSonWithKiya.JPG
Image via
One of Angela Zorich's sons relaxing with Kiya the pit bull
Here's an update on the lawsuit filed last week by Angela Zorich, the South County woman who claims tactical police killed her dog when they raided her home in 2014 to investigate building code violations.
Daily RFT has obtained documents that appear to be the police's own incident reports. They tell the cops' side of the story, which boils down to this: The family was considered "a nuisance" by neighbors, and during the raid, Kiya, the four-year-old pit bull, was "charging to attack" as they shot her.
Zorich insists in her suit that, on the contrary, Kiya didn't even have time to bark before being killed.
And interestingly, by the cops' own telling, the dog was 12 feet from the officers when they opened fire and killed her. They also acknowledge in the report that they'd entered the home without knocking, even though they were investigating code violations. Their justification: They believed the residents had "extensive violent history" and were known to be armed.
The police narrative goes like this:
Kiya.JPG
Image via
Kiya
On April 23, 2014, an anonymous tipster called in to complain that the folks living at a house on 3000 block of Caprock Court "frequently cause disturbances" and allow a dog to "run at large" and "stay out all night and day, barking non-stop." Plus, the tipster said, the house's gas had been shut off.
An officer checked the logs and saw that, in 2014 alone, police had already fielded several calls for service vis-a-vis the Zorich residence, including "disturbances" and "vicious animals." Per the report: "There is a hazard/alert on the property that was entered in 2012 indicating that two cars be dispatched as the residents do not like the police and can become violent."
At that time, according to the report, Angela Zorich had outstanding warrants for traffic and motor vehicle violations; a Joseph M. Zorich was wanted for several offenses including assault; and Zachariah D. Zorich was wanted for several offenses as well, including two counts of assault.
(Our search of Missouri's online court records did not reveal any actual charges or convictions of assault against either of those two men.)
On April 25, two problem property inspectors drove out to investigate the house, accompanied by three police officers. When they approached the front door, someone shut it, locked it and said, "fuck you!"
But the inspectors took notes on the exterior, which showed that Laclede Gas had indeed shut off service. And in the backyard, tied to a deck that looked like "a collapse hazard," was a "large aggressive dog."
They placed a "Problem Property" sticker on the front window. Here's a Google Maps photo from 2013, the year prior to all these incidents:
CaprockHouse.JPG
After placing the sticker, the police received e-mails from neighbors complaining about underage drinking on site, profanity, young people coming and going, and the noisy, unleashed pit bull, according to the report.
On April 28, police received a call from Angela Zorich, who was "yelling and cursing" (she admits to cursing in her lawsuit). She demanded to know what was going on. An officer told her that police needed to check the inside of the house. She said she wanted to talk to her husband and her attorney first. An officer said the investigation would continue anyway.
The next day, at around 12:30 pm, the tactical unit set up position outside the house. From the report:
Excerpt-NoKnock.JPG
They moved in:
Excerpt-DogShot.JPG
The report's author names four other officers who "were inside the residence when shots were fired and they relayed to me that they also believed the dog was charging to attack."
Zorich and two of her sons were arrested.
Zorich was arrested for those traffic warrants -- failure to register a vehicle, for speeding and for violating electric signal.
One son was arrested on warrants for violation of financial responsibility, interfering with duties of a police office, peace disturbance, and assault. A second son was arrested for failing to appear in a previous traffic case.
And here's where things get really weird: At one point during the SWAT raid, according to the report, a neighbor exited his his house, began "giving 'Heil Hitler' type salutes" and "shouting racist remarks at a member of the Tactical Unit....he was pointing to a 'swastika' tattoo on his person." This guy "ran inside his residence when officers started to walk towards him."
The report contained no additional information on the man's connection to the case.
Not all neighbors acted this way toward the cops. Some neighbors, reportedly, felt grateful:
Excerpt-Neighbors.JPG
According to Stephen Deere at the Post-Dispatch, who followed the story Saturday, the house has been sitting empty for almost a year.
The case has also drawn the attention of Kristin Hoffmann, founder of 4KOPS, which stands for "Keeping Our Pets Safe." 4KOPS is a national, informal network of attorneys and advocates who aim to hold police accountable for killing domestic animals without cause.
While her grassroots network is national, Hoffman happens to be a resident of South St. Louis. She says city police fatally shot two of her dogs in 2012, an experience so disturbing it led her to advocacy.
Hoffman says that many people whose pets get killed by police grow upset because when they complain, they don't feel like they're being heard.
"Compassion goes such a long way," she says.
Perhaps, but wouldn't a compassionate word from an officer expose his/her police department to costly lawsuits like the one Angela Zorich filed?
"If we're not evolved enough as a society to have a common way to express compassion without it being an admission of guilt," Hoffman said, "we have a serious problem."

Saturday, 14 March 2015

Chadwick Barrett--"I hate pitbulls they ALL should be shot"

My Question is the dog had already displayed aggrression and was secured so how did it get a hold of the K9 controllers arm in the first place??..


Why didn't he use a catch pole on an animal that had already demonstrated it willingness to bite?


I am troubled for 2 reasons, A so it was safer to both draw guns and shoot a dog 5 or so times when the dog was in close proximatey to and had hold of the K9 controllers arm as opposed to running over and grabbing the dog?



"I hate pit bulls and think they should ALL be shot."


Chadwick Barrett updated his cover photo.
Chadwick Barrett changed his profile picture.

Tuesday, 27 January 2015

LAW ENFORCEMENT WARNED TO STOP SHOOTING PETS

Gunner was shot in the neck by an off-duty Texas officer who claimed the boxer attacked him, his wife and his dog.  Twelve-year-old Dalton Fitzhenry says Gunner was just curious and sniffing the other dog when officer Mark Condon fired at point-blank range.
Gunner was shot in the neck by an off-duty Texas officer who claimed the boxer attacked him, his wife and his dog. Twelve-year-old Dalton Fitzhenry says Gunner was just curious and sniffing the other dog when officer Mark Condon fired at point-blank range.

With the number of frequent shootings by police against non-aggressive family dogs, it’s about time we see something being done within the police community. Online magazine Law Enforcement Today has recently published an article warning officers not to shoot loved family dogs.
James P. Gaffney, author of the article, is an LET risk management/police administration contributor to the publication, and served with a metro-New York police department for more than 25 years as a patrol officer, sergeant, lieutenant and executive officer. He brings to light the popular opinion that dogs are not just pets, but “valued family members,” and that the preferred term is now “canine companion.”
Police are supposed to use objective reasonableness, i.e. common sense, when they are on the job. Approaching an unknown dog, or entering a dog’s territory, can incite an attack. Then police officers shoot, and cry self-defense. Well, if they thought a situation through using common sense and compassion, their deadly actions might not have been necessary. A siren or a loudspeaker could be used to alert an owner to their presence and to suggest their dog be safely secured instead of just barging onto a property and killing a dog for defending its territory and family from an intruder.
Dogs are excellent at sensing danger, and if they come across people they perceive as a threat, they might immediately become defensive and attack. As trained on the job, police can come across as menacing, something a nervous dog can certainly sense, and may act on.
Officers are trained to take whatever measures are necessary to protect themselves. Of course, officers have the expectation of self-protection from dogs that are attacking. But officers should not be employing a “shoot first, think later” mentality in cases where they enter a property clearly marked “Beware of Dog(s),” when they come across friendly runaways or when dogs are merely running toward them but not attacking.  And how many times now have we heard stories of police shooting dogs on the wrong property?  Don’t they have GPS?  
7.10.13 - Law Enforcement Today1
Star was critically injured by officers when trying to protect her owner, a homeless man, who was having a seizure. After down on the ground having just been shot, another officer continued shooting the clearly injured dog.

It is natural for a dog to run up to a person they do not know, but it is not fair to assume they are running to attack. There is other clear body language that officers should be able to recognize, just as they are trained to recognize body language in humans. Should it become necessary to use protective measures against a dog, pepper spray could disable, and a baton could stun. But many officers just whip out their guns and shoot, not giving a moment’s thought to the fact that they are robbing a family of a beloved member just because they got scared and couldn’t hold themselves together.  And yeah, so their training requires them to fire multiple shots when shooting.  Are they so brainwashed that they are only running on instinct and autopilot (isn’t that reassuring?), and can’t use their brains to think to fire a single shot towards a leg, aiming only to injure but not kill?  Or what about firing a shot into the sky, which might be loud enough to frighten the dog off?  Why do they not retreat, letting a dog know they are not in danger?  (This seems simple enough, but clearly is challenging concept.)  And why is there such blatant disregard for anything else that might be injured?  Many bullets are through-and-through, or ricochet, leaving the possibility that others can be killed in their reckless gun shows of cowardice.
If “regular” citizens can receive up to a 20-year prison sentence for killing a police dog (many of which have viciously attacked people, unable to distinguish between ordinary citizens and “perps”), then why is there such a double standard for police officers? Why are they above the law and the people they are meant to protect and serve? It seems that more and more these days, we need protection fromthem.
Well, police now can be held accountable in the case of wrongful death of a dog. It is illegal for officers to seize a dog by deadly physical force unless the actions taken are deemed objectively reasonable pursuant to the Fourth Amendment. Law enforcement officers know about objective reasonableness when using force against humans (though not all of them apply it), it is new for courts to recognize that this can apply to dogs killed in the line of duty.
When courts sets precedents in their rulings, it can take a long time for police law to catch up. At a conference attended by Gaffney last month, he learned from Chicago attorney Laura Scarry that shooting a family dog could be considered a violation of the Fourth Amendment. This amendment grants US citizens the right to be secure in their persons, houses, papers and effects, protected from unreasonable arrests and seizures. Federal courts are now recognizing a dog as an “effect.”
This precedent is the result of the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals ruling in the case of Fuller v Vines, 36 F.3d 65,68 (9th Cir. 1994), where it was ruled in favor of the defendant and enabled protection of dogs against wrongful death. The Bill of Rights has flexibility that allows for changes to be made as societal expectations change, and many in society want their dogs to be protected not only by the law, but fromit.
Police dogs are considered valued members of the force, and “ordinary” dogs are considered valued members of families. It is time they are recognized as such and treated accordingly; with caution and respect, as police would expect anyone who approaches their dogs.

17-year-old girl shot and family pet killed after SWAT raid on wrong home

A MOTHER AND DAUGHTER ARE SUING THE ORANGE COUNTY SHERIFF’S OFFICE AFTER A NEGLIGENT SWAT RAID ON THEIR HOME LEFT THE DAUGHTER FULL OF BULLET HOLES AND THEIR FAMILY DOG DEAD


The mother and daughter, who are choosing to remain anonymous, are the latest victims to come forward in the state’s immoral war on drugs.
The incident happened back in 2010, when an Orange County Sheriff’s Office SWAT team raided the home looking for a family member who did not even live there.
“I got up and went towards the door and literally once I went towards the door, boom!” the daughter said.”I was 17. I was 5 feet 2 inches and 100 pounds wet,” she said. “And they came in shooting.”
The overzealous SWAT team came in guns drawn and firing. The family’s boxer, startled at the noise, ran into the room and was gunned down by these violent storm troopers.

Why Are So Many Dogs Being Shot by Police? By Pets Adviser

Police shootings of dogs
A New York City police officer shoots a dog. By: Gothamist.
A New York City police officer shoots a dog named Star, who was protecting her injured owner, August 13, 2012. By: Gothamist.
On a chilly night in late February
in Fishers, Ind., Patricia McConnell was taking her daughter’s 7-year-old, 20-pound terrier mix, Reese, out for a midnight potty.
Reese was harnessed and on a retractable leash, but as she bounded ahead around a corner, the dog saw a neighbor and started to bark. Unfortunately, this neighbor was Chief Deputy U.S. Marshal William “Buzz” Brown. Reese was able to bark only two times before the deputy shot the leashed dog twice.
Brown, who says he felt threatened, was two feet away from the dog when he thought she might attack him. Amazingly, Reese survived. However, because she was shot at such a close range, Reese’s front left leg and shoulder had to be removed, and her back left leg was left shattered. The vet bills reached $10,000.
Patricia McConnell said the shooting was so unexpected that she feared that if she said anything, the officer would fire at her as well. Her daughter, Deborah Twitty,told Fox59 that they live in fear of their neighbor. “I’m afraid he’s going to retaliate,” she said of the deputy.
The two women describe their ordeal in the short video below:
U.S. Attorney Kerry Forestal responded to the public outcry that followed by saying, “I trust Chief Deputy Brown’s ability to make decisions on a daily basis, and I continue to trust him.”
Reese is very lucky to be alive — many dogs that have encounters involving police and guns don’t survive.

What’s Going On?

Recently, there has been a steady drip of awful stories like the one above. Most of them occur when a law enforcement officer feels threatened by a dog and makes a split-second decision to shoot. Sometimes, as with Reese, the dogs are leashed — or even tied up in their own yard. There are even shootings where it turns out the dogs were running away or hiding.
Because there are no national records or a centralized database of dog shootings, it’s hard to tell if incidents are on the rise in the United States. However, a review by Pets Adviser of “use of force” statistics from several large cities shows no notable uptick in these cases. In fact, in New York City the yearly number of dog shootings by police is far below the inflated numbers of the late 1990s (43 dogs shot in 2011 versus an average 82 per year in 1996-98; numbers include vicious dog attacks).
The increased attention to these cases in recent months appears to be due to heightened awareness, more extensive media coverage and social networking buzz when a shooting occurs. The shootings occur so often, in fact, that a certain numbness has started to set in. One commenter online wryly remarks, “Same story. Family. Dog. Cops. Dog shot. Dog dead. Family bereaved. Shooting justified. No matter what. Repeat.”

Pit Bulls Are #1 Victim

Stacy Field (in purple) gets a hug during a vigil for her dog Kincaid, killed by Baltimore police on New Year's Day. By: Matthew Mahlstedt for Pets Adviser
Stacy Fields (in purple) gets a hug during a vigil for her dog Kincaid, killed by Baltimore police on New Year’s Day. By: Matthew Mahlstedt for Pets Adviser
The idea that pit-bull-type breeds areaggressive has led to many of these dogs being labeled as “threatening” by cops and shot dead with minimal provocation, sometimes in the dogs’ own yard. Pets Adviser found that around 75 to 85 percent of dogs shot by police are pit bulls.
This is not to say that other dog breeds haven’t suffered as well. German shepherds, Rottweilers, Labrador retrievers, terriers, Shar-Peis, even registered therapy and service dogs — all have been victims.
Just a few egregious examples:
  • Late last summer in Spartanburg, S.C., a sheriff’s deputy shot dead an 8-year-old shepherd mixnamed Diamond who was tied to the front porch. “Why did you shoot my dog?” the owner pleaded. The officer’s response: “She tried to bite me.” Diamond was at the end of her restraint when she was shot, according to the dog’s owner.
  • One night in April 2011, police in Camden, N.J.,sprayed a neighborhood with gunfire to take down a pit bull puppy named Capone — even as one lone police officer pleaded, “Don’t shoot him!” Witnesses say more than 30 bullets were fired, ricocheting across vehicles and piercing a home. “It was like a war zone,” one startled resident recalls.
  • A Gulfport, Miss., police officer investigating a possible break-in at the house next door fired five or six times at an 11-year-old dog named Melmoin the dog’s own backyard. Making matters worse, Melmo was on a chain that ended “about 30 feet away” from the officer, according to the dog’s owner.
  • A Newfoundland named Rosie who had escaped from her home was Tased multiple times, thenexecuted by officers in Des Moines, Wash. Adashboard video of the long ordeal shows officers wondering aloud what to do with the dog if they catch her — then they conclude, “We should just shoot [her].” They chase her down to finish the job. Another officer hollers “Nice!” when Rosie is shot. A witness says the officers high-fived one another afterward.
  • Everything was friendly and conversational when a man in Kingman, Ariz., left his 2-year-old pit bull dog outside with police while he stepped inside his home to retrieve his ID. He told the officers that the dog, Blue, wouldn’t bite and says the officers seemed comfortable. Moments later, there was a loud pop outside. A neighbor says he saw a deputy fire his weapon as the dog casually walked by the group of officers. The neighbor also says he overheard another officer tell the shooter, “Go sit in your cruiser and keep your mouth shut.” The official police report claims the dog was charging and aggressive.
  • On New Year’s Day of this year, a pit bull mix named Kincaid was barking at a man running from police who had trespassed into his yard. Baltimore police shot six times at the dog; half the shots missed Kincaid and his owner (who was reaching for the dog’s harness) by only inches. Kincaid died on the scene.
  • A miniature bull terrier puppy named Colonel,who had just wandered out of his home in a bustling Chicago neighborhoodwas shot twice by an officer who happened to be out front writing a parking ticket. Multiple witnesses say the puppy was simply sniffing a tree about a car-length away from the police officer who shot him. Colonel is lucky to be alive after five hours of emergency surgery.
  • Baby Girl, a pit bull mix who was so sweet that one of her best friends was a rabbit, was taken to a dog park on Staten Island, N.Y., when a fight broke out between two other dogs. While those other dogs were being separated, the police were called. When they arrived, witnesses say Baby Girl got scared and ran toward the woods. Officers shot and gravely wounded her. Baby Girl held on through several surgeries as her family prayed she would pull through; however, she died a few days later.
In the video below, Natalie Yandle and Aiden talk about the loss of their dog Bucky, a therapy dog. Then Rita Hairston talks about how much she misses her dogPrada:


Deadly Consequences

The biggest factor in the shootings appears to be insufficient training of officers in dog behavior and non-lethal conflict resolution when dealing with animals. Jim Crosby, a retired deputy in Jacksonville, Fla., says, “There’s no training that I’m aware of, nothing cohesive…. That’s a tool the officers haven’t been given even though they are given extensive training on everything else you can think of.”
Seen through the eyes of someone with little or no experience with dogs, a family pet bounding toward the door can easily be mistaken as a dog about to attack. If that person at the door has a badge and a gun, the consequences can be deadly.
Police officers shoot thousands of dogs per year, according to former officer Jim Osorio, who is now a specialist at the National Humane Law Enforcement Academy, which provides instruction to police departments. The question is, are there that many “aggressive” dogs? If so, why aren’t we seeing more dog attacks on mail carriers? “Just because a dog barks doesn’t mean it’s an aggressive dog,” says Osorio.
On the next page: “Armed with a Milk Bone and Mace”…